Skip to content
AlternativeMed

Durban Poison: Cultivar Profile With Sources, Lineage Claims and Lab Data Limits

Durban Poison profile: its reported South African origin, genetic and aroma studies, three retail samples that tested well below their labels, and why no typical potency is given.

Content last updated . This page has not been medically reviewed.

Documented data at a glance

Source status: Includes documented laboratory measurements. Names and market labels do not guarantee composition or effects, and a batch result is not a typical value for the cultivar.

Preferred name
Durban Poison
Aliases
None documented
Name conflicts
Name used for different products (landrace-derived imports and a modern stabilized F1 version); South African landrace naming is poorly documented.
Breeder attribution
Not verified
Retail label
Sativa (retail label) (a marketing category, not a measurement)
Cannabinoid dominance
THC-dominant

Reported lineage

  • South African origin from the port city of Durban (Leafly) (Reported; source: Leafly, Durban Poison strain page (commercial encyclopedia; attributed description, not evidence of composition). Read 2026-10-22.)
  • Imported from South Africa, inbred, never hybridized (seed listing 1) (Reported; source: SeedFinder.eu strain database, Durban Poison listing 1 (seed-company description; marketing claim with limits). Read 2026-10-22.)
  • Stabilized F1 based on South African landrace genetics (seed listing 2) (Reported; source: SeedFinder.eu strain database, Durban Poison listing 2 (seed-company description; marketing claim with limits). Read 2026-10-22.)

Laboratory measurements: cannabinoids

Maryland (6 analytes)

dataset (Maryland flower, N=124 samples; test dates 2018-02-05 to 2023-12-10; median of 122 samples with a value). Laboratory: lab ID 1101 (116); lab ID 2501 (4); lab ID 1201 (3); lab ID 6401 (1). Dates: 2018-02-05 to 2023-12-10. Method: not reported in dataset. Source: Cannlytics. cannabis_results dataset, data/md/md-results-latest.csv (Maryland lab/regulator results, 105,013 rows; flower rows product_type 'Buds'; test dates 2017-12 to 2023-12). Licence CC BY 4.0. Read 2026-10-22.

Dataset summary
AnalyteMedianMinimumMaximum
CBD000
CBDA000.077
CBG0.10500.72
CBN000.141
Delta-9 THC1.5304.57
THCA22.53513.3329.1

Values are percent by weight as inferred from the dataset (the source does not label units per column). The median is calculated from the dataset; minimum and maximum are reported.

Nevada (7 analytes)

dataset (Nevada flower, N=214 samples; test dates 2020-01-30 to 2023-10-04; median of 193 samples with a value). Laboratory: NV CANN LABS LLC (112); CERTIFIED AG LAB LLC (49); G3 LABS LLC (27); DPL NV LLC (11) .... Dates: 2020-01-30 to 2023-10-04. Method: not reported in dataset. Source: Cannlytics. cannabis_results dataset, data/nv/nv-results-latest.csv (Nevada, 153,064 rows; flower rows product_type 'Marijuana Flowers/Buds'; test dates 2020-01 to 2023-12). Licence CC BY 4.0. Read 2026-10-22.

Dataset summary
AnalyteMedianMinimumMaximum
CBD000
CBDA000.14
CBN000.65
Delta-9 THC0.58702.541
THCA21.247.61828.809
Total cannabinoids21.33029.79
Total THC19.396.6826.24

Values are percent by weight as inferred from the dataset (the source does not label units per column). The median is calculated from the dataset; minimum and maximum are reported.

Hawaii (5 analytes)

dataset (Hawaii flower, N=5 samples; test dates 2021-11-09 to 2022-11-17; median of 5 samples with a value). Laboratory: not reported in dataset (5). Dates: 2021-11-09 to 2022-11-17. Method: not reported in dataset. Source: Cannlytics. cannabis_results dataset, data/hi/hi-results-latest.csv (Hawaii, 13,485 rows; flower rows product_type 'Flower Lot'). Licence CC BY 4.0. Read 2026-10-22.

Dataset summary
AnalyteMedianMinimumMaximum
CBD000
CBDA0.050.040.06
CBG0.150.10.15
CBN000
Total cannabinoids22.9820.6823.37

Values are percent by weight as inferred from the dataset (the source does not label units per column). The median is calculated from the dataset; minimum and maximum are reported.

Cannabinoid measurements with batch context
AnalyteValueScopeSample / batchLaboratoryTest dateMethodReported or calculated
total THC11.54 % w/wsingle batchDurban Poison 1, Dispensary 2, Denver CO (label 17.4%; SD 1.38; 3 replicates)Mile High Labs, Loveland, Coloradonot reported (paper published 2023)HPLC, total THC % by dry weightreported
total THC13.72 % w/wsingle batchDurban Poison 4, Dispensary 3, Denver CO (label 20.88%; SD 2.03; 3 replicates)Mile High Labs, Loveland, Coloradonot reported (paper published 2023)HPLC, total THC % by dry weightreported
total THC13.51 % w/wsingle batchDurban Poison 5, Dispensary 6, Fort Collins CO (label 21.5%; SD 0.57; 3 replicates)Mile High Labs, Loveland, Coloradonot reported (paper published 2023)HPLC, total THC % by dry weightreported
THC (observed; paper defines total THC = THC + 0.877 x THCA)11.54 % dry weightsingle batch (retail package; mean of 3 HPLC replicates, SD 1.38)Durban Poison 1 | Dispensary 2, 402R-00012Mile High Labs (Colorado)not reported in sourceHPLC-DAD, 240 nm, C18 reverse phase, Cerilliant standardsreported
THC (observed; paper defines total THC = THC + 0.877 x THCA)13.72 % dry weightsingle batch (retail package; mean of 3 HPLC replicates, SD 2.03)Durban Poison 4 | Dispensary 3, 403R-00073Mile High Labs (Colorado)not reported in sourceHPLC-DAD, 240 nm, C18 reverse phase, Cerilliant standardsreported
THC (observed; paper defines total THC = THC + 0.877 x THCA)13.51 % dry weightsingle batch (retail package; mean of 3 HPLC replicates, SD 0.57)Durban Poison 5 | Dispensary 6, 402R-00235Mile High Labs (Colorado)not reported in sourceHPLC-DAD, 240 nm, C18 reverse phase, Cerilliant standardsreported

Each row describes the stated sample or dataset only. Composition varies between batches. Sources are listed in the page references.

Laboratory measurements: terpenes

Nevada (11 terpenes)

dataset (Nevada flower, N=214 samples; test dates 2020-01-30 to 2023-10-04; median of 77 samples with a value). Laboratory: NV CANN LABS LLC (112); CERTIFIED AG LAB LLC (49); G3 LABS LLC (27); DPL NV LLC (11) .... Dates: 2020-01-30 to 2023-10-04. Method: not reported in dataset. Source: Cannlytics. cannabis_results dataset, data/nv/nv-results-latest.csv (Nevada, 153,064 rows; flower rows product_type 'Marijuana Flowers/Buds'; test dates 2020-01 to 2023-12). Licence CC BY 4.0. Read 2026-10-22.

Terpene dataset summary
TerpeneMedianMinimumMaximum
alpha-Bisabolol0.0610.0020.331
alpha-Humulene0.07300.309
alpha-Pinene0.0970.0180.963
beta-Caryophyllene0.140.0250.741
beta-Myrcene0.1950.021.74
beta-Pinene0.1330.031.321
Caryophyllene oxide0.02200.138
D-Limonene0.0890.0170.97
Linalool0.0530.0050.497
Terpinolene1.1350.0017.058
Total terpenes1.780.5812.81

Percent by weight as inferred from the dataset. The median is calculated; minimum and maximum are reported. A terpene is listed only when the dataset gave a value above zero.

Identity

Durban Poison is a retail cultivar name (often called a strain) tied to the port city of Durban, South Africa. Leafly says it originates there. [1] A 2024 review says the name, like "Swazi Gold" and "Mpondo Gold", became famous worldwide, and warns that no study has mapped South African landraces (locally adapted traditional varieties), so different names may be applied to the same plants and the same name to different plants. [2]

Reported lineage, confidence reported: a seed listing says it was imported from South Africa, produced in Holland and inbred, not hybridized. [3] Another listing describes a modern, stabilized first-generation (F1) version based on South African landrace genetics. [4] These are two different products carrying one name. Breeder attribution for the original is unknown; no verifiable individual breeder was found. See cultivar names, aliases and conflicts.

Classification

The retail label is sativa. Leafly calls it a "pure sativa", and a seed listing says 100% sativa. [1][3] Those are labels. In a genetic study of 30 retail strain names, an online database listed Durban Poison as 100% sativa, yet the genetic analysis did not support sativa and indica as clean groups. [5] In another study, a drug-type sample named Durban Poison fell in the hemp-type genetic group (0.95 assignment). [6]

Cannabinoid dominance is THC-dominant according to a 2024 review that cites a report I could not read; I did not verify it from a primary source. [2] See THC-dominant, CBD-dominant and mixed chemotypes.

Genetics and consistency

The 2019 study tested samples named Durban Poison from dispensaries in Colorado and Washington and found one divergent sample, so even this name did not map to one genotype. [5] A later study found three Durban Poison samples to be genetically identical to each other. [7] Both are small studies, and neither shows that all products with this name match.

Appearance

Leafly describes round, chunky buds with a thick coating of trichomes (the resin glands on the surface of the flower). [1] This is a reported description.

Aroma and constituents

In the 2022 study, 55 untrained panelists smelled Durban Poison samples and described them as citrus, lemon, sweet and pungent. [7] This is a sensory finding on three samples, not a terpene measurement. No readable batch-level terpene data was found, so no terpene percentages are given. See terpenes in cannabis.

Potency

Composition varies. The best verified data are three retail samples from the 2023 Colorado study, where a third-party laboratory (Mile High Labs, Loveland, Colorado) measured total THC by HPLC on a dry-weight basis. Test dates were not reported; the paper was published in 2023. [8]
Sample (as labeled)Label, total THC %Measured total THC % (SD)Replicates
Durban Poison 117.411.54 (1.38)3
Durban Poison 420.8813.72 (2.03)3
Durban Poison 521.513.51 (0.57)3

[8]

All three measured well below their labels. These are three separate retail samples from different dispensaries, reported as in the paper, not a typical value. Listings and reviews give other ranges; those are marketing or secondary claims and are not repeated. See laboratory variability, batch numbers and test dates.

Reported experiences

These are anecdotes, not research. Leafly describes sweet-smelling, energetic and uplifting effects. [1] In a Nevada dataset of 2,662 lab-tested samples, some Durban Poison-named samples sat apart from the main chemical clusters, which shows the name does not guarantee one profile. [9]

Research

Evidence label: insufficient evidence for the cultivar itself. The studies above test genetics, aroma and label accuracy. I found no controlled trial of Durban Poison in people. General cannabinoid research does not validate this cultivar. Evidence labels on this page: insufficient evidence means studies exist but are too few or too weak to judge; preclinical means cells or animals only; "Proper evidence not found" means I looked and found nothing usable.

Safety

Labels can differ from lab results, so a number on the package is a poor guide to strength. [8] The risks of THC-containing cannabis are covered on impairment and driving and adverse effects and use disorder. In the US, Poison Help is 1-800-222-1222; call 911 for emergencies. This is education, not medical or legal advice.

Frequently asked questions

Where does Durban Poison come from?

It is reported to originate in or near Durban, South Africa. The name is used for different products, and landrace naming there is poorly documented. [1][2]

Is Durban Poison a pure sativa?

It is sold as one. Genetic testing of retail samples did not support clean sativa and indica groups. [1][5]

How strong is Durban Poison?

No typical value can be stated. Three labeled samples measured 11.54%, 13.72% and 13.51% total THC against labels of 17.4%, 20.88% and 21.5%. [8]

Does Durban Poison smell the same every time?

In one study, three genetically identical samples were described as citrus, lemon, sweet and pungent, but that is a small sample. [7]

References

  1. Leafly, Durban Poison strain page (commercial encyclopedia; attributed description, not evidence of composition). Read 2026-10-22.
  2. Ndlangamandla VV et al. Finally Freed-Cannabis in South Africa: A Review Contextualised within Global History, Diversity, and Chemical Profiles. Plants (Basel) 2024. Read 2026-10-22.
  3. SeedFinder.eu strain database, Durban Poison listing 1 (seed-company description; marketing claim with limits). Read 2026-10-22.
  4. SeedFinder.eu strain database, Durban Poison listing 2 (seed-company description; marketing claim with limits). Read 2026-10-22.
  5. Schwabe AL, McGlaughlin ME. Genetic tools weed out misconceptions of strain reliability in Cannabis sativa: implications for a budding industry. J Cannabis Res 2019. Read 2026-10-22.
  6. Schwabe AL, Hansen CJ, Hyslop RM, McGlaughlin ME. Comparative Genetic Structure of Cannabis sativa Including Federally Produced, Wild Collected, and Cultivated Samples. Front Plant Sci 2021. Read 2026-10-22.
  7. Schwabe AL, Naibauer SK, McGlaughlin ME, Gilbert AN. Human olfactory discrimination of genetic variation within Cannabis strains. Front Psychol 2022. Read 2026-10-22.
  8. Schwabe AL, Johnson V, Harrelson J, McGlaughlin ME. Uncomfortably high: Testing reveals inflated THC potency on retail Cannabis labels. PLoS One 2023. Read 2026-10-22.
  9. Reimann-Philipp U et al. Cannabis Chemovar Nomenclature Misrepresents Chemical and Genetic Diversity. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2020. Read 2026-10-22.
Education, not medical advice. This page is for general information. It does not diagnose or treat any condition and is not a substitute for care from a qualified health professional. Natural does not automatically mean safe. Ask a clinician or pharmacist before changing your care, especially if you take medication, are pregnant or breastfeeding, or have a health condition.