Relationship Graph Explorer
Follow the connections
Every herb, ingredient, formula, gene target, and disease — connected through real research. Search, pick a subject, and navigate the graph in any direction.
🌿
Herb
6,826
→
⚗️
Ingredient
44,598
→
🧬
Gene Target
15,695
→
🏥
Disease
30,467
→
🧪
Evidence
23,295
trials · metas · refs
Plus 6,743 TCM formulas connecting herbs together
🏥 Disease / Health Topic
Pyogenic Arthritis of Hip
0
Clinical Trials
0
Meta-Analyses
0
PubMed References
🏥 All Disease / Health Topic data fields for Pyogenic Arthritis of Hip
🏥 Names
Disease Name
Pyogenic Arthritis of Hip
Topic Type
syndrome
🧬 Ontology Classifications
DisGeNET Type
disease
UMLS Type
Disease or Syndrome
MeSH Class
Infections; Musculoskeletal Diseases
🔗 External References
HERB DB
DisGeNET
C0409543
🔍 Raw view — every non-empty column on this row (21 fields)
name
Pyogenic Arthritis of Hip
topic type
syndrome
disgenet disease type
disease
umls disease type
Disease or Syndrome
mesh disease class
Infections; Musculoskeletal Diseases
umls disease type id
T047
mesh disease class id
C01; C05
herb disease id
HBDIS009009
disgenet id
C0409543
No relationships found yet for this entity. Try picking one of the top-researched items above.
How to read these connections
Each box lists records connected to the one you are viewing, and says how the connection was made. A connection shows that two records are related in the source data. It does not show that something works, is safe or should be used, and a record with many connections is not necessarily better studied or more effective.
- Study records (trials, systematic reviews, publications): the study names this subject. Registered or ongoing studies have no results here, and animal or cell research does not show an effect in people.
- Source-database links (for example herb and compound, compound and gene target): taken from the imported databases and not independently checked by us.
- Name matches (for example formula and herb, or a condition named in a study): found by matching names, so they can be wrong. Treat them as leads, not findings.